此網頁為2015年的香港大學民意研究計劃檔案網頁,不會再作更新。若需瀏覽最新資料,請到網址 http://hkupop.hku.hk
This is the archived webpage of HKU POP SITE of the year 2015 and no longer updated. For latest information, please visit http://hkupop.hku.hk.

政改方案第三次民意調查返回


調查方法 / Survey Method |  樣本資料 / Contact Information |
| 人口變項 / Respondents' demographics調查問卷 / Full questionnaires |
| 22名民主派立法會議員對港大第三輪民意調查結果的回應
Reponses from 22 pan-democratic Legislative Councillors to POP's third round opinion survey result
|
 

[Q1] 基本法第45條寫明行政長官既產生辦法根據香港既「實際情況和循序漸進的原則」,最終達至普選產生。咁你認為應該係邊一年實現普選行政長官?()
[Q1] Article 45 of Basic Law states that the method for selecting the Chief Executive shall be specified in the light of the actual situation in the HKSAR and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress. The ultimate aim is the selection of the Chief Executive by universal suffrage. Which year do you think the selection of the Chief Executive by universal suffrage should be implemented?
()

  調查日期
  Date of survey
 愈快愈好/2007或更早
The sooner the better/2007 or earlier 
 2008至2012之間
Between 2008 and 2012 
 2013至2017
Between 2013 and 2017 
 2018至2022
Between 2018 and 2022 
 2023年或以後
2023 or later 
 唔知/難講
DK/HS 
 合計
Total 
  3-6/7/2007  10.0%   46.0%   15.7%   5.0%   3.7%   19.6%   100.0% 
  1-7/6/2007  10.0%   43.1%   18.1%   4.4%   4.6%   19.8%   100.0% 
  9-12/12/2005  28.8%   29.5%   8.0%   1.8%   1.8%   30.0%   100.0% 
  30/11-1/12/2005  26.5%   34.7%   11.1%   1.2%   0.9%   25.5%   100.0% 

[Q2] 基本法第68條寫明立法會既產生辦法根據香港既「實際情況和循序漸進的原則」,最終達至全面普選。你認為應該係邊一年實現普選立法會?()
[Q2] Article 68 of Basic Law states that the method for forming the Legislative Council shall be specified in the light of the actual situation in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress. The ultimate aim is the election of all the members of the Legislative Council by universal suffrage. Which year do you think the selection of Legislative Councillors by universal suffrage should be implemented?
()
  調查日期
  Date of survey
 愈快愈好
The sooner the better 
 2008 (或更早)
2008 (or earlier) 
 2009至2012之間
Between 2009 and 2012 
 2013至2016
Between 2013 and 2016 
 2017至2020
Between 2017 and 2020 
 2021年或以後
2021 or later 
 唔知/難講
DK/HS 
 合計
Total 
  3-6/7/2007  10.2%   21.6%   33.2%   8.4%   5.2%   2.4%   18.9%   100.0% 
  1-7/6/2007  9.4%   21.3%   34.0%   8.4%   4.6%   2.8%   19.4%   100.0% 
  9-12/12/2005  11.1%   27.4%   22.5%   6.7%   1.8%   0.8%   29.8%   100.0% 
  30/11-1/12/2005  9.3%   27.3%   26.2%   6.8%   1.1%   1.7%   27.7%   100.0% 


[Q3] 假設2012年行政長官選舉是由一個提名委員會先提名或者過濾候選人,然後由市民一人一票選出行政長官。你認為提名委員會最少要提名幾多個候選人俾巿民一人一票選出行政長官?()
[Q3] If a nomination committee were to be set up to nominate or vet candidates for the 2012 Chief Executive election before entering the stage of universal suffrage, at least how many candidates do you think should be nominated? ()

  調查日期
  Date of survey
 1人
1 candidate
 2人
2 candidates
 3人
3 candidates
 4人
4 candidates
 5人
5 candidates
 6-10人
6-10 candidates
 唔知/難講
Don』t know/hard to say
 
 合計
Total
 
 1.5%   12.6%   33.8%   8.3%   17.6%   6.6% 
  3-6/7/2007  11-49人
11-49 candidates
 50人
50 candidates
 51-99人
51-99 candidates
 100人
100 candidates
 多於100人
More than 100 candidates
 愈多愈好
The more the better
11.2%  100.0% 
 2.8%   0.4%   0.3%   0.5%   0.5%   4.0% 
  中位數
  Median
 平均數
Average 
 誤差*
Error* 
  3人
3 candidates
 6人
6 candidates 
 +/-0.8人
 
+/-0.8 candidates 
*以95%置信水平計,即倘若以不同隨機樣本重複進行有關調查100次,則95次的結果會在正負誤差之內。


[Q4] 咁你認為提名委員會最好提名幾多個候選人俾巿民選擇?()
[Q4] What do you think is the ideal number of candidates to be nominated by the nomination committee for the universal suffrage? ()

  調查日期
  Date of survey
 1人
1 candidate
 2人
2 candidates
 3人
3 candidates
 4人
4 candidates
 5人
5 candidates
 6-10人
6-10 candidates
 唔知/難講
Don』t know/hard to say
 
 合計
Total
 
 0.7%   4.4%   21.3%   10.1%   22.4%   14.9% 
  3-6/7/2007  11-49人
11-49 candidates
 50人
50 candidates
 51-99人
51-99 candidates
 100人
100 candidates
 多於100人
More than 100 candidates
 愈多愈好
The more the better
14.1%  100.0% 
 4.0%   0.4%   0.4%   1.1%   0.6%   5.5% 
  中位數
  Median
 平均數
Average 
 誤差*
Error* 
  5人
5 candidates
 8.2人
8.2 candidates 
 +/-1.1人
 +/-1.1 candidates 
*以95%置信水平計,即倘若以不同隨機樣本重複進行有關調查100次,則95次的結果會在正負誤差之內。


[Q5] 咁你認為提名委員會提名既候選人唔應該超過幾多個?()
[Q5] What do you think is the maximum number of candidates to be nominated by the nomination committee for the universal suffrage? ()

  調查日期
  Date of survey
 1人
1 candidate
 2人
2 candidates
 3人
3 candidates
 4人
4 candidates
 5人
5 candidates
 6-10人
6-10 candidates
 唔知/難講
Don』t know/hard to say
 
 合計
Total
 
 0.1%   2.1%   6.1%   5.0%   25.9%   29.2% 
  3-6/7/2007  11-49人
11-49 candidates
 50人
50 candidates
 51-99人
51-99 candidates
 100人
100 candidates
 多於100人
More than 100 candidates
 愈多愈好
The more the better
11.4%  100.0% 
 9.4%   1.7%   0.6%   2.2%   2.0%   4.4% 
  中位數
  Median
 平均數
Average 
 誤差*
Error* 
  6人
6 candidates
 13.7人
13.7 candidates 
 +/-1.5人
 +/-1.5 candidates 
*以95%置信水平計,即倘若以不同隨機樣本重複進行有關調查100次,則95次的結果會在正負誤差之內。


[Q6] 就2012年行政長官選舉方面,有意見認為應該將現有既800人選舉委員會,加上約400名民選區議員,組成約1,200人既提名委員會,而50名委員可提名1位行政長官候選人,最後由市民一人一票選出行政長官。你有幾支持或者反對呢個方案?()
[Q6] Regarding the Chief Executive election in 2012, it is proposed that 400 directly elected district councilors should be added to the existing 800-member Election Committee, adding up to a total of approximately 1,200 committee members. The number of subscribers required should be 50 regardless of the sector they belong to. The Chief Executive should ultimately be elected by universal suffrage. Do you support or oppose this proposal? ()

  調查日期
  Date of survey
 非常支持
Very Support 
 幾支持
Quite Support 
 一半半/一般
Half-half 
 幾反對
Quite Oppose 
 非常反對
Very Oppose 
 唔知/難講
DK/HS 
 合計
Total 
  3-6/7/2007  13.1%   35.8%   19.8%   10.6%   9.2%   11.6%   100.0% 
  18-22/6/2007  21.5%   35.0%   16.9%   8.2%   5.9%   12.6%   100.0% 
  1-7/6/2007  18.7%   33.0%   21.7%   10.3%   6.3%   9.9%   100.0% 

組合數據 Collapsed data
  調查日期
  Date of survey
 支持
Support 
 一半半/一般
Half-half 
 反對
Oppose 
 唔知/難講
DK/HS 
 合計
Total 
  3-6/7/2007  48.9%   19.8%   19.8%   11.6%   100.0% 
  18-22/6/2007  56.5%   16.9%   14.1%   12.6%   100.0% 
  1-7/6/2007  51.8%   21.7%   16.6%   9.9%   100.0% 


[Q7] 有意見認為行政長官選舉應該加入一 D預先篩選機制,確保中央政府能夠接受候選人,但又有意見認為唔應該加入預先篩選機制因為唔想選舉變得冇真正競爭。你傾向認同邊種講法多D?()
[Q7] It is proposed that a sort of prior vetting mechanism would be added to the Chief Executive election to secure the acceptance of candidates by the Central government. However, some other holds another view that no prior vetting mechanism should be introduced as this would eliminate the real competition in the election. Which view are you more inclined to? ()

  調查日期
  Date of survey
 傾向認同應該加入預先篩選機制以確保中央政府能夠接受候選人
Inclined to adding some prior vetting mechanism to secure the acceptance of candidates by the Central government 
 傾向認同唔應該加入預先篩選機制以便選舉有真正競爭
Inclined not to introducing prior vetting mechanism for a real competition in the election. 
 兩者都認同
Agree to both
兩者都不認同
Neither of them 
 唔知/難講
DK/HS 
 合計
Total 
  3-6/7/2007  39.0%   43.7%   2.4%   1.9%   13.0%   100.0% 


[Q8] 就2012年立法會選舉方面,有意見認為應該採用混合選舉模式,一半議席由單議席單票以簡單多數制產生,另一半議席則由全港單一選區按比例代表制產生,每名市民可以投兩票。你有幾支持或者反對呢個方案?()
[Q8] Regarding the Legislative Council election in 2012, it is proposed that a mixed election model would be adopted, whereby half of the seats would be returned by a "single seat single vote" simple majority system. The other half of the seats would be returned through elections by the "proportional representation system" so that each voter can cast two votes. Do you support or oppose this proposal? ()

  調查日期
  Date of survey
 非常支持
Very Support 
 幾支持
Quite Support 
 一半半/一般
Half-half 
 幾反對
Quite Oppose 
 非常反對
Very Oppose 
 唔知/難講
DK/HS 
 合計
Total 
  3-6/7/2007  10.1%   37.6%   18.7%   12.6%   6.6%   14.4%   100.0% 
  18-22/6/2007  8.7%   36.5%   17.7%   10.0%   5.3%   21.9%   100.0% 
  1-7/6/2007  9.6%   29.9%   21.2%   15.8%   4.7%   18.8%   100.0% 

組合數據 Collapsed data
  調查日期
  Date of survey
 支持
Support 
 一半半/一般
Half-half 
 反對
Oppose 
 唔知/難講
DK/HS 
 合計
Total 
  3-6/7/2007  47.8%   18.7%   19.1%   14.4%   100.0% 
  18-22/6/2007  45.2%   17.7%   15.3%   21.9%   100.0% 
  1-7/6/2007  39.5%   21.2%   20.5%   18.8%   100.0%